Biased G7 criticism: Iran rejects criticism of missile strike on Israel.


The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has called the condemnation by the Group of Seven (G7) of their attack on Israel "biased and irresponsible".
Tehran's missile strike on Israel, which saw over 180 rockets launched, was a response to the killings of militants and aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.
This was reported by Reuters.
A week ago, an Israeli airstrike in Beirut claimed the life of the deputy commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, Abbas Nilforoushan, and the leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, supported by Iran.
G7 leaders condemned Iran's attack and expressed "deep concern" over the crisis in the Middle East, however, they stated that a diplomatic resolution to the conflict is still possible and is not in the interests of either side.
A representative of the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs warned G7 countries, particularly the United States, that their support for Israel increases danger and instability in Western Asia. He noted that these countries provide Israel with financial and political support.
The Ministry announced that it summoned the ambassadors of Germany and Austria after they summoned Iranian representatives in their countries to condemn the missile strike on Israel.
In its statement, the Ministry also mentioned that if European countries took effective actions, including withholding financial and military support, they could stop the violence and genocide committed by the Zionist regime of Israel.
Read also
- Enemy losses as of June 30, 2025 – General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
- Return of Russia to SWIFT: US Senator Poses Uncomfortable Question to Trump Administration
- Pathological Liar: The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Revealed Putin's True Motives Regarding NATO
- Mossad Operation: The Times Reveals Details of Israel's Years of Preparation for Attack on Iran
- Frontline situation as of June 29. Summary of the General Staff
- Unequal situation: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs revealed the true reasons for rejecting restrictions on anti-personnel mines